Design + development, one price
Why "design" and "development" should be one number, not two
Here is how the Rajshahi version of this goes wrong. You find someone who makes a beautiful Figma mockup for a low price. You approve it, you pay, you feel good. Then comes the sentence: "Apni design e taka diyechen, development er jonno alada budget lagbe." Now the working website costs more than the mockup did, the two people blame each other when something breaks, and the thing you actually wanted — a site that loads — is still not online.
The website design and development price in Rajshahi only makes sense as one figure because design and development are one decision. How a page looks decides how hard it is to build. What it has to do — a silk-product catalogue, an admission-enquiry form, a bKash button — decides how it has to be coded. When the same person owns both, nothing falls in the gap between "approved design" and "working site," and you get one quote you can actually plan around.
That floor is 50,000 BDT, and it buys the complete thing: a design made for you, then built, tested, and pushed live on your own domain. From there it's 50,000 / 90,000 / 1,50,000 BDT depending on how many pages and how much real functionality you need, with fully custom work from 3,00,000 BDT. You pay 50% to begin and 50% the day it launches — no "design fee" up front and a mystery "development fee" later.
Rajshahi clients tend to be careful with money and allergic to being upsold mid-project — fair, after watching neighbours get nickel-and-dimed. So I scope the full design-and-development job before you commit a taka, you approve the look under a design-approval guarantee, and the number doesn't move unless you ask for something new. One person, one quote, one site that ships.
See pricing in BDT