The freelancer, not the agency
What you actually get when you hire one developer instead of a firm
Most Dhaka founders who go looking for a software developer have already been through one bad round: an agency in Banani that pitched well, took the advance, then handed the real work to a junior nobody introduced. Three weeks of silence, a half-built admin panel, and a 'sir, almost done' every time you ask. By the time you reach me you don't want another team - you want one person who is accountable for the whole thing and answers his own phone.
That is the entire point of hiring a freelance software developer in Dhaka the way I work. I scope it, I architect it, I write it, and I deploy it. When something breaks at 11pm there is no ticket queue - there is me. You are not paying for a sales department, a project coordinator, and an office in Gulshan baked into your invoice. You are paying for the work and the person doing it.
I build web applications, internal dashboards, admin panels, booking and inventory tools, and customer-facing portals - the kind of software a growing business in Dhaka actually needs, not a science project. I think about who logs in, how data flows, how your staff will actually use it on a cheap Android phone, and how you'll add to it next year without paying a fortune to untangle someone's mess.
Five years of doing this solo means I've learned where projects die: vague scope, no written agreement, and a client and developer who never wrote down what 'done' means. So I do the boring part well. We agree exactly what's being built, what it costs, and what 'launched' looks like - in writing, before any code - so the koto-taka conversation and the scope conversation happen once, not every week.
See pricing in BDT